Tag Archive: YA

Movies, History, and Books for Kids

By Melissa Luttmann

Don’t you just love the movie Gone with the Wind? The beautiful costumes, the intriguing heroine, the quotable lines…it’s a great work of fiction. And I wish that more people would take notice of those last three words: work of fiction. Gone with the Wind is a delightful movie, but not every detail in it is historically accurate.

If you write a novel set during one of Hollywood’s favorite historical periods (of which the Civil War is one), your young readers may come to it thinking that they know everything there is to know about that time. After all, they saw it in a movie, and Hollywood wouldn’t lie. As historical fiction writers, there isn’t much we can do about the way films portray history, but we can and should be aware of the notions our readers may have gotten from them.

If there are well-known films set during the same time period as your novel, watch them, whether they’re recent releases or classics. Sometimes you may be pleasantly surprised by how many historical details the filmmakers got right.

At others you may find a major misconception you’d like to clear up. (I personally am grateful to the authors whose books showed me that not all Southerners owned plantations with hundreds of slaves.) But either way, you’ll know what impressions your readers may have of your time period.

DISCUSSION:

Do you agree that kids’ impressions of history can often come from movies?

Do you think most films are fairly accurate in how they portray history, or do they often get the details wrong?

Melissa Luttmann is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

A Bright Spot for YA Historical Fiction

By Melissa Luttmann

Sometimes the future of YA historical fiction looks pretty grim, but this blog post gave me a lot of hope for the genre.

The author, a YA novelist/teacher, asked her students what sorts of books they do and don’t like, and what they’d like to see more of. Based on what’s currently selling in the YA market, and on the books I see the teens I know reading, I expected these students to endorse fantasy (especially vampires, given the current Twilight craze) and chick lit. I definitely didn’t expect so many of them to say they liked historical fiction.

I understand that this is a small sample of teens to begin with, and that the number of responses the teacher chose to include on her blog is even smaller. Still, out of eleven teens this author quoted, five of them said they like historical books. That number goes up to six if you include the student who enjoys nonfiction. Even if these responses don’t likely represent teens as a whole, they’re still much, much higher than I would have expected.

Furthermore, the things teens said they’d like to see more of can easily be included in any book, including a historical one. Realistic plots and characters, humor, romance…all of those elements transcend genres. And most importantly, it appears that teens want books that don’t talk down to them. Seems to me that they’ll be more than happy to pick up your historical novel—or any novel—as long as it speaks to them, not at them.

DISCUSSION:

What do you think about the views these teens hold on YA literature?

Is there anything about this blog post—particularly in regards to historical fiction—that surprised you?

Melissa Luttmann is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Using Museums for Historical Research

By Melissa Luttmann

Every reader loves juicy historical details, and kids are no exception. Descriptions of unfamiliar foods, interesting objects, or everyday activities are a great way to establish your setting and to interest young readers.

But how do you discover these specific historical tidbits? You can uncover them in books, of course, but I’ve found that an even better way is to head to a museum.

I’m not talking about the Smithsonian here, although you could certainly find some great information there. Instead, your best bets are likely to be small museums with very specific focuses. I’ve been road tripping in New England this past week, and I’m amazed by the wealth of information you can find if you know where to look.

If you’re searching for in-depth coverage of early American furniture, Russian icons, or African-Americans in World War II, you might want to consider heading up this way. These museums aren’t known on a national scale, but they’re some of the best resources for the areas they cover.

Museums are filled with objects you can examine all you like (though you generally can’t touch them), which is incredibly helpful when you want to write a description of one. In addition, they feature knowledgeable staff who are more than happy to answer your questions.

I’ve found that these people tend to be very passionate about their area of expertise and will often give you much more information than you asked for. But that’s okay, because you can never do too much research…right?

DISCUSSION:

What do you think about using museums to research historical fiction?

Are there any that you’ve found to be especially amazing?

Melissa Luttmann is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Selling Historical Fiction to Teens

By Melissa Luttmann

Historical fiction author Ann Rinaldi puts a warning label on each of her books—literally. On the back covers of her novels, you’ll find a block of text that reads, “WARNING: This is a historical novel. Read at your own risk. The writer feels it necessary to alert you to the fact that you might enjoy it.”

Seeing that warning on the back of Ms. Rinaldi’s latest release made me think about the way teens perceive historical fiction. I know many teens who refuse to so much as look at historical novels because they find their history classes at school boring. They see history as a bunch of dry facts to be crammed into their brains for the next test, and never stop to consider that history is actually about stories—many of which are very interesting.

Because so many teens have an aversion to historical fiction, those of us who write it are, in a way, aiming for a slightly different market than other YA authors. Of course it would be wonderful if a teen who never liked history picked up your book and fell in love with it. But if your novel is going to stay in print, people have to buy it, and the people who are going to buy a YA historical novel are mostly members of that specific group of teens who like history.

This isn’t necessarily a bad thing—I’ve found that many historical fiction lovers are voracious readers who buy tons of books and are loyal to authors they like—but it does mean the average teen consumer is less likely to pick up your novel.

DISCUSSION:

Do you think historical fiction can be a hard sell to the average teenager?

Does it bother you that many teens don’t like history, or are you just happy for the ones that do?

Melissa Luttmann is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

An Exciting Fall Release

By Melissa Luttmann

Looking through publishers’ catalogues, I found that tons of historical fiction titles are going to be published in September, but one new release got me especially excited. This fall, Scholastic is bringing back its Dear America series (originally published from 1996 to 2004). They’ll be adding new titles as well as reissuing some previously published ones.

I still have a near-complete set of the original series on my bookshelf, and I must admit that I occasionally reread my favorites for the sheer pleasure of it. But I’ve also learned a thing or two about writing historical fiction from them, because, being written in diary format, these books are great examples of the elusive quality known as voice.

The vast majority of Dear America authors do a great job of making their main characters sound like real, relatable girls, and the fact that they manage do this while blending period-authentic vocabulary and style with modern readability never ceases to amaze me. That, in my opinion, is a skill well worth mastering, especially in historical fiction written in the first person.

I’ll definitely be getting my hands on the series’ first new title when it releases this September. First I’ll read it for my own enjoyment, and then I’ll go back and study it to see how the author develops the main character’s voice. It just so happens that this book is set during the same time period as one of my works in progress—World War II—so I’m interested to see how the author handles the language of the time.

DISCUSSION:

Are you a fan of the Dear America books?

Any other middle grade or YA books that you feel are particularly outstanding examples of voice?

Melissa Luttmann is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Historical Fiction Isn’t Just Historical Fiction Anymore

By Melissa L.

If someone asked you to define “historical fiction,” you would probably say that it’s fiction set sometime in the past. And if you gave that answer, you would be fundamentally correct. But historical fiction isn’t just historical fiction anymore. More and more, it’s being crossed with other genres to produce books that toe the line between historical and something else.

Historical romances. Historical mysteries. Historical fantasy. These are all examples of the types of books I like to call “historical hybrids”: books that can be called historical fiction, since they do have a historical setting, but are also strongly tied to another genre. In the YA market, these books often seem to sell better than straight historical fiction because they can appeal to a wider audience. Many teens, who otherwise find history boring, will pick up a book that’s fundamentally a romance.

The question with such books, though, is the extent to which they can actually be called historical fiction. For example, many historical fantasy novels are meticulously researched, and their authors certainly deserve credit for including as much historical accuracy as possible—but they’re still fantasy. Part of the point of historical fiction is that the events described in it could have happened, and we all know that people didn’t really work magic in historical times. Is there any way you can ascribe the label “historical fiction” to such a novel? Or is it solely fantasy?

Discussion:

What do you think about the so-called historical hybrids? Can you call them historical fiction, or do they really belong more to their other genres?

Melissa L. is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

The Importance of Setting

By Melissa L.

One of the first books about writing historical fiction that I ever read described setting as “another character in a historical fiction novel.” I can’t completely agree with this analogy—in my opinion, “character” should really refer to a person—but it made me think about the huge role that setting plays in historical fiction.

As I’ve discussed several times before, historical fiction should, above all else, tell a compelling story. But the point of historical fiction is that the story grows out of the time and place. You may choose to use specific historical events as the basis for your plots and characters, or you may simply write a book that’s set in a given point in history, but either way, there should be a clear reason for the book to be set when and where it is. Otherwise, I would argue that you aren’t really writing historical fiction—you’re writing a middle grade or young adult novel that just so happens to be set in the past. (And honestly, if a historical setting isn’t a vital part of your story, is there any reason not to set it in the modern day?)

In most cases, a setting doesn’t drive your plot in quite the same way that your characters do. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t every bit as vital as strong characters. A strong setting gives historical fiction a strong base—a base that distinguishes it from other kinds of books.

Discussion:

How important is setting in historical fiction? Can it accurately be called “another character”?

Melissa L. is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Female Characters in YA Historical Fiction

By Melissa L.

I recently came across a discussion about female characters in YA historical fiction on one of the boards I belong to. The general consensus was this: If you are a female main character in a YA historical novel, and you are not overly spunky and ahead of your time, then, clearly, you are in the wrong book.

Okay, so maybe this isn’t true for every work of YA historical fiction. But as a whole, the female protagonists in these books are a remarkably progressive bunch. I can’t tell you how many books I’ve read set in medieval Europe in which a girl wants to be educated just like the boys—or, even more frequently, to choose her own husband. Not that I disagree with these sentiments…but when you consider the social norms of the time, they just aren’t very accurate.

I understand that if historical fiction portrayed the lives of ordinary women as they were throughout much of history, a lot of those books would be pretty boring. (Who really wants to read about a medieval girl who spends all her time learning to manage a household?) I also understand that there have always been at least a few women who actually were ahead of their times, and that these are just the sorts of people today’s kids want to read about.

But I can’t help but think that we aren’t doing modern children and teens a favor by creating this skewed view of young women throughout history. Until recently, most women weren’t expected to be well-educated or to have a say in who they married. Maybe portraying that reality in our books would help modern teens to understand how the young women of the past really lived—and to realize how far we’ve come.

Discussion:

Do you think female characters in historical fiction are too progressive to be historically accurate?

Is this really a problem, or does just it make otherwise dull books more interesting?

Melissa L. is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Feeding Kids’ Curiosity

By Melissa L.

Over the past few years, I’ve noticed that the world history courses taught in school have been getting broader and broader in their scope. Far from focusing mainly on Europe, classes now delve into Asia, Africa, and Latin America, among other regions. On the one hand, I suppose this is a good thing, since it gives a truly global history rather than just a history of the West. On the other hand, though, with so many places and times to cover, no region or period is studied very thoroughly.

That’s where history and historical fiction titles come in. The books we write can help to feed curiosity that may go unsatisfied in a class that’s moving too quickly to go in-depth on any one topic. Perhaps a child’s world history class spends only two or three days on the Aztecs—but if that child is intrigued and hungry for more, she can go to the library, check out a stack of books, and read about the topic to her heart’s content. And who knows? Maybe what she reads about the Aztecs will spark her interest in other pre-Columbian civilizations in the Americas, and she’ll check out more books to learn about the Incas and the Olmecs and the Maya.

Satisfying curiosity. Sparking interest in a new topic. Giving children the history they can’t learn just from a textbook. That’s what those of us who write history and historical fiction for children do, and I’m constantly amazed by what our books can do.

Do you agree that good historical titles can feed a child’s curiosity or encourage a new interest? What are some other things that historical fiction for children can do?

Melissa L. is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.

Rules for Writing Historical Fiction

By Melissa L.

Like nearly everything else in life, it seems that writing historical fiction comes with its own set of rules. While browsing the Internet, I discovered an article entitled “Seven Rules for Writing Historical Fiction,” by Elizabeth Crook, the author of three historical novels. Crook’s article is intended for authors of historical fiction in general, but I found some of her rules especially applicable to writing for children.

At first glance, Crook’s first two rules—“Sweat the Small Stuff” and “Cut the Ballast”—seem to contradict one another. In reality, though, both are vital to a good novel for young readers. As a historical fiction author, you need to know virtually everything about your time period in order to write accurately; after all, you don’t want to give your readers a false impression of history. At the same time, though, all of the details you learn don’t have to make their way into your book. Kids have notoriously short attention spans, and if you bog them down with information they don’t want or need to know, they’re likely to put the book down.

The idea of including only necessary details echoes in Crook’s sixth rule, “Don’t Get Bogged Down by Back-story.” You need to know the entire back-story, of course, but your readers only need it to a certain extent. Kids in particular like their books to open at a fast pace. If you devote your first chapter entirely to the back-story, you’ll quickly bore and lose your readers.

What do you think about Crook’s set of rules? Are there any other rules you would say are important in historical fiction for kids?

Melissa L. is the YA Editorial Assistant for Wonders and Marvels. You can read more about her here: Editorial Staff.