Category Archives: Uncategorized

What do the Rose Bowl and the Ottoman Empire have in common?

By Pamela Toler, W & M Contributor

Marching bands.

Beginning in 1299, the elite corps of the Ottoman armies, the janissaries, used military bands made up of wind and percussion instruments to inspire their troops and terrify their enemies.  (Not that different from a half-time show, right?)  The music they played was called mehter, a stirring mixture of drums, horn and oboe with a distinctive marching rhythm based on the Turkish phrase “Gracious God is good.  God is compassionate.”  Often four to five hundred musicians accompanied the army. Sometimes the music alone was enough to drive enemy forces from the field.

The European troops encountered mehter music during the seventeenth century wars against the Ottomans on Europe’s eastern border. European civilians heard mehter music for the first time when Sultan Suleyman II presented Augustus the Strong of Poland (1670-1733) with a mehter band of his very own.  Europe was fascinated by the new sound; by 1770 most European armies had bands featuring Turkish instruments and fanciful variations of Turkish costumes.

Turkish music also played into the taste for turquerie (otherwise known as “Turkish stuff”) that swept European society in the eighteenth century.  Popular composers, including Beethoven, Haydn, and Mozart, wrote “Turkish” symphonies, ballets, and operas using new percussion instruments borrowed from the Ottomans– bass drums, snare drums, cymbals, triangles, and Turkish crescent (also known as the “jingling Johnny”).  The fashion reached its artistic height in 1777 with Mozart’s Escape from the Seraglio.  The fad for turquerie soon ended, but Turkish percussion instruments found a permanent home in the western symphony orchestra.

In 1826, the janissaries mutinied against Sultan Mahmud II.  They were slaughtered by troops loyal to the sultan and the mehter bands were dispersed.  Today a mehter band is attached to the Istanbul Military Museum.  The band performs several times a week in a specially designed auditorium.  It’s well worth hearing, but take your earplugs.  Mehter bands don’t have an indoor voice.

About the author: Pamela Toler is a freelance writer with a PhD in history and a large bump of curiosity. She is particularly interested in the times and places where two cultures meet and change.  

Steve Jobs and Typography

 

 

By Simon Garfield

On June 12 2005, a fifty-year-old man stood up in front of a crowd of students at Stanford University and spoke of his campus days at a ‘lesser institution’ – Reed College in Portland, Oregon. ‘Throughout the campus,’ he remembered, ‘every poster, every label on every drawer, was beautifully hand calligraphed. Because I had dropped out and didn’t have to take the normal classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do this. I learned about serif and sans serif typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter combinations, about what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can’t capture, and I found it fascinating.’

 

At the time, the student, who would later drop out of college, believed that nothing he had learned would find a practical application in his life. But things changed. Ten years after his college experience, that man, by the name of Steve Jobs, designed his first Macintosh computer, a machine that came with something unprecedented – a wide choice of fonts. As well as including familiar types such as Times New Roman and Helvetica, Jobs introduced several new designs, and had evidently taken some care in their appearance and naming. They were named after cities he loved, such as Chicago and Toronto. He wanted each of them to be as distinct and beautiful as the calligraphy he had encountered a decade earlier, and at least two of the fonts – Venice and Los Angeles – had a handwritten look to them.

 

It was the beginning of something – a seismic shift in our everyday relationship with letters and with type. An innovation that, within another decade or so, would place the word ‘font’ – previously a piece of technical language limited to the design and printing trade – in the vocabulary of every computer user.

 

You can’t easily find Jobs’s original typefaces these days, which may be just as well: they are coarsely pixelated and cumbersome to manipulate. But the ability to change fonts at all seemed like technology from another planet. Before the Macintosh of 1984, primitive computers offered up one dull typeface, and good luck trying to italicize it. But now there was a choice of alphabets that did their best to re-create something we were used to from the real world.

 

Chief among them was Chicago, which Apple used for all its menus and dialogs on screen, right through to the early iPods. But you could also opt for old black letters that resembled the work of Chaucerian scribes, London, clean Swiss letters that reflected corporate modernism ‘, or tall and airy letters that could have graced the menus of ocean liners New York. There was even San Francisco, a font that looked as if it had been torn from newspapers – useful for tedious school projects and ransom notes.  IBM and Microsoft would soon do their best to follow Apple’s lead, while domestic printers (a novel concept at the time) began to be marketed not only on their speed but for the variety of their fonts. These days the concept of ‘desktop publishing’ conjures up a world of dodgy party invitations and soggy community magazines, but it marked a glorious freedom from the tyranny of professional typesetters and the frustrations of rubbing a sheet of Letraset. A personal change of typeface really said something: a creative move towards expressiveness, a liberating playfulness with words.

 

And today we can imagine no simpler everyday artistic freedom than that pull-down font menu. Here is the spill of history, the echo of Johannes Gutenberg with every key tap. Here are names we recognize: Helvetica, Times New Roman, Palatino and Gill Sans. Here are the names from folios and flaking manuscripts: Bembo, Baskerville and Caslon. Here are possibilities for flair: Bodoni, Didot and Book Antiqua. And here are the risks of ridicule:

 

Brush Script, Herculanum and Braggadocio. Twenty years ago we hardly knew them, but now we all have favourites.

Reprinted from Just My Type by Simon Garfield by arrangement with Gotham Books, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Copyright © 2011 by Simon Garfield.

 

Poisoning in the Hungry Forties

By Kaitlyn Berry (Vanderbilt University)

 

My tender, pretty, smiling babes,

With poison I did slay.

And after that I did cruel take

My husband’s life away

 

This was the chant coming from the crowd of 10,000 that gathered to witness the execution of Sarah Chesham. Chesham, who had a reputation in Essex for her arsenic laced mince pies, was convicted of the homicidal poisoning of her husband in 1849. A few years earlier Chesham had been acquitted for the murder of two of her sons because the arsenic found in their remains could not be traced directly to her. However, it was widely believed that in addition to killing her husband to collect life insurance, Sarah Chesham had murdered her two sons in order to collect burial club money.

In 1849, Rebecca Smith, a middle aged woman with poor health and no money, was convicted and hanged for the murder of her infant son. After the conviction, the bodies of her other nine deceased children were exhumed and traces of arsenic were detected in several of their bodies. Smith later confessed “that she had poisoned her babies, fearing that they might ‘come to want’” (Watson 88). Evidently, Smith felt that killing her children was kinder than letting them die slowly of starvation- a common fate of many poverty-stricken children during the decade known as the Hungry Forties.

These two stories are prime examples of the over one hundred criminal poisoning cases reported during the 1840s. The hopeless economic conditions in England and high unemployment rates in the early forties led to an alarming increase in the number of child poisoning and infanticide cases. Poison, especially arsenic, was incredibly cheap and easy to find because of the lack of drug regulations. It offered women like Rebecca Smith and Sarah Chesham an easy solution to their financial woes that could potentially go undetected.

Sources:

Knelman, Judith. Twisting in the Wind: the Murderess and the English Press. Toronto: Univ. of

Toronto, 1998. Print.

Watson, Katherine. Poisoned Lives: English Poisoners and Their Victims. London: Hambledon

and London, 2004. Print.

 

 

 

Monday Check-In

By Holly Tucker (W&M Editor)

So, how’d everyone do on their goals this week?  My goal for the week was to work through some of the structural issues that I was having with this next book.  I’m happy to report that the issues are resolved–and I’m feeling very good about how things are looking.  What I’m less happy to report is that I didn’t get as much writing as I had planned in this week because of a fatal miscalculation…I forgot that I was leaving for a conference on Wednesday in Ann Arbor.  I also forgot that I had two presentations to prep: one for the conference, and one here at the Vanderbilt Medical School.

How it’s possible to forget these things, I just don’t know.  Especially since I am a calendar and organizational fiend.  But I’ll give myself a break since it’s the craziest time of the semester.  It’s probably an accomplishment enough to still be standing right now.

Both of the talks seemed to go well.  But I’m very, very eager to get back to work on the book.  Not sure that I’ll hit that crazy deadline of December 7 that I gave myself…but I do know that I don’t want this to linger much longer.  I was reminded last night as I sat down for a writing session that you’ve just got to stay with it every day.  I didn’t think that I had even 15 minutes of energy in me, but as soon as I got the courage to open Scrivener and start writing the words and ideas just flowed.  As every writer will tell you, there is no secret to writing.  Just do it.  Au travail!

How about everyone else?  Did you meet YOUR goals?

 

Women, Death, and the Sacraments

By Elizabeth A. Lehfeldt

“The contagious pestilence, which is now spreading everywhere, has left many parish churches and other benefices in our diocese without an incumbent, so that their inhabitants are bereft of a priest…we understand that many people are dying without the sacrament of penance because they do not know what they ought to do in such an emergency…if when on the point of death they cannot secure the services of a properly ordained priest, they should make confession of their sins…to any lay person, even to a woman, if a man is not present.”*

This oft-cited passage speaks volumes about the devastation wrought by Bubonic plague in the late Middle Ages.  Medieval Christians, deeply concerned about questions of salvation, believed it absolutely necessary to make a final confession before their death.  Yet the swift death (most of the visibly infected who succumbed did not live longer than a week) at the hands of the disease and the overwhelming mortality rates confounded the ability of priests to hear so many confessions.  Medieval Europeans understood the moment of death as a vulnerable moment (well-illustrated by the image reproduced here), when demons might tempt the soul of the dying.  And so, the Bishop of Bath and Wells bent the rules in a rather astounding fashion.  First, he allowed that laypeople could perform this sacrament.  This alone was an amazing inversion of medieval hierarchies that invested priests alone with this authority.  But then the bishop, in a move that must have produced gasps throughout the sanctuaries of his diocese (priests would have been instructed to read his admonitions aloud), extended that same power to laywomen.  The salvation of souls, at least in this instance, trumped any misgivings about the gender of the person exercising this authority.

Yet this was not the only instance in premodern times of women being entrusted with sacramental responsibility.  Evidence from Germany and England also reveals that midwives were allowed to perform emergency baptisms.  Worried that vulnerable newborn infants might die before the priest could arrive, civic and ecclesiastical authorities admitted that it was worth jettisoning the rules in order to secure the salvation of these newly-arrived souls.  Once again, salvation trumped gender.

Significantly, what links these exceptions to the rule is the specter of death.  The presence of women at the moment of possible death from a terrifying disease or at the precarious moment of an infant’s birth created exceptional circumstances that invested them with unusual power and authority.

* Ralph of Shrewsbury, Bishop of Bath and Wells, writing in 1349.  Reproduced in Rosemary Horrox, The Black Death (Manchester, 1994), 271-3.

Elizabeth A. Lehfeldt is Professor of History at Cleveland State University.  She regularly teaches a course on the history of Bubonic plague and writes on the history of gender in Europe between 1400 and 1700.

Contributor Q & A: Pamela Toler

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q:  Tell us a little bit about yourself.  You’ve lived life both inside and outside academe, as a Ph.D. who now writes freelance.  What has the Ph.D. allowed you to do, when it comes to writing, that you wouldn’t have been able to do otherwise?

The first thing my graduate school advisor said to me was, “You know there are no jobs, right?”

In some ways it’s very freeing to know in your gut that there isn’t a job at the end of the process.   I took the twenty-year plan for getting my degree, in part because I didn’t hesitate to wander down any fascinating by-ways that presented themselves because-hey, no jobs.

Ironically, that dead-end, do-it-because-you-love-it PhD got me my first freelance assignment, and has been opening doors for me ever since.

Q:  How did you first become interested in early Arabic science and culture?  What has been the most exciting part your research?  And the greatest struggles?

The short answer is I found my way to Islamic history via the British Empire.  British imperialism leads you inevitably to India, which leads you to Islam, which in my case led me over the Himalayas to the larger Islamic world.  I spend a lot of time in eighth century Baghdad and medieval Spain these days

The most exciting part of research for me is finding the point where two cultures connect and change each other.   My greatest struggle is flinging myself against the barricades of our collective ignorance about the non-Western world. Quite frankly, Americans as a group aren’t very good about learning the history of other countries except at the points where it intersects with our own.

Q:  What writers have shaped the way you understand your own work–both in regard to approach and content, as well as how one goes about shaping a narrative in historical writing?

I want to be Barbara Tuchman when I grow up.

Q:  Do you read for pleasure?  Do you have time to read for pleasure?  And what do you love to read?

Do I have time to read for pleasure?  No, but I do it anyway.  Over meals.  In the line at the grocery store.  On the bus.  To cool down my brain at the end of a long day.  If I don’t make time to read, I get cranky.

My tastes are broad. I’m too much of a wimp for horror, but pretty much everything else goes. I’m currently reading a literary mystery, a graphic novel, a fat biography, three historical studies dealing with three different periods, a romance (you heard me), two “mainstream” novels, a fantasy, and a Russian classic.

Q:  Now the predictable question:  If you could catapult yourself into the past for just one day, where would you go?  Who would you want to see?  And why?

November 2, 1920, the first national election in the United States in which women were allowed to vote. Can you imagine how thrilling it would have been like to vote in that election?

 

 

 

 

Rose Tucker, With Thanksgiving

By Holly Tucker (Editor, Wonders & Marvels)
I spent this evening in the kitchen with my grandmother.  My soulmate, she left this world eight years ago. Not a day goes by that I don’t miss her.

Tonight, I taught my daughter how to make my grandmother’s dumplings.  I know the motions by heart.  A large bowl, flour, salt, pepper, eggs.  An even larger pot, filled with turkey stock, bubbling furiously.  The rolling pin, gliding deftly across the dense, light-yellow dough.  Not too sticky, not too dry.  A butter knife slices perfect rectangles.

Just as my grandmother did with me, I allowed my eager daughter to roll out the first batch of dumplings–as I hovered nervously. There is an art of dumpling making.  It is not a craft for novices.  The dumplings have to be just right, not too thick, not too thin.

Ball after ball of dough, dumpling after dumpling cut.  I picked up one up and sighed.  My daughter gave me a worried look.  ”Am I doing it wrong?”  No, oh darling No.

Feel how soft and smooth this one is?  See how beautiful the edges are?  I was in my grandmother’s kitchen.  The alternating green and white tiles on her kitchen floor.  The sound of my grandfather listening to Marty Robbins in the front room. The warm smell of Sunday dinner mingling with the pleasant, familiar mustiness of the country home where I spent long summer weeks and every holiday.

My daughter beamed proudly.

I have spent all of my adult life writing and researching the past.  But tonight reminded me that if there is ever a past that we must never lose sight of, it is the one we each have lived–and those who have joined us, always too briefly, along the way.

Merci, grand-mère.  Tu me manques plus que je ne pourrais jamais exprimer.

 

Wandering the Virtual Stacks

By Tracy Barrett, W & M Contributor

I love poking through library shelves, stumbling on books whose existence had never occurred to me; finding, next to the book I’m looking for, an even more interesting one; marveling at titles (a recent favorite: The Thirteenth: Greatest of Centuries—take that, people who call the Middle Ages barbaric!); feeling somehow proud that the book I’m clutching was last checked out during the Second World War.

Now I do most of my research by typing keywords into little boxes on a screen. But it’s occurred to me that the way one on-line hit leads to another that leads to another is the same process, and can take you to—well, not to entire books extolling the brilliance of the 1200’s in Europe, but to a fact that will make a scene or a character gain that little bit of depth that will bring it to life.

Case in point: the copy editor on my young-adult novel Dark of the Moon pounced on a passage where I said that Theseus’ stepfather grated cheese over a bowl of lentil soup. “Did the ancient Greeks have cheese graters?” she asked.

Well, of course they had some way of consuming hard cheese—they wouldn’t throw it out. But that got me wondering about how exactly they made it edible, so I set out to look for an answer.

Here’s what I learned:

  • Not only did the ancient Greeks have cheese graters, they looked remarkably like the ones we use today.

    A knestris!

  • The Greek word for “cheese grater” is κνήστις (knestris, in the Latin alphabet) or τυρόκνηστις.
  • When the women in Aristophanes’ Lysistrata go on a sex strike to force their husbands to quit fighting, they renounce a sexual position called “the lioness on the cheese grater.”
  • The spot on your back that you can’t reach to scratch is called the “aknestris.”

How many of these facts did I wind up using in Dark of the Moon? Only the first, and it all it did was confirm that what I had already figured out must be accurate. But the search gave me a lovely wander through the virtual stacks.

 

Tracy Barrett is the author of numerous books for young readers, most recently two young-adult novels set in ancient Greece, King of Ithaka and Dark of the Moon. She lives in Nashville, TN, where she teaches at Vanderbilt University.

On the Shortcomings of University Students

By Marri Lynn (W&M Contributor)

It’s become a common conceit to think that the disappointing student is a modern invention. Lecture-halls filled with napping students and dull eyes are, we often think, the lamentable but inevitable result of such distractions as Facebook, cell phones, and the devaluation of education for education’s sake.

We may take heart – or despair at the persistence of the habits of the errant student — in learning that these complaints are as old as university education itself.

 

The Franciscan Alvarus Pelagius turned his talent for social critique (honed in penning De planctu ecclesiae libri duo, a prose campaign for curbing ecclesiastical excess) toward his experiences of students, resulting in a short but pointed tract. The university students that Pelagius complained of numbered among a select few afforded the privilege of attending university in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries.

It was a privilege and an historical moment which, according to Pelagius, was completely wasted on them.

These students were opinionated, ignorant partiers who engaged in gambling and drinking with more gusto than they ever applied to their education. If they bothered to go to class, they were merely physically present, letting the words of their educated masters flow in one ear and out the other. The exception to this rule was when “forbidden sciences, amatory discourses, and superstitions” (timeless student favorites) came up in a lecture; these the student would learn avidly, when they should be ignored.

Students skipped church, choosing to “gad about town with fellows.” When they did deign to attend church, it was to see girls and exchange stories, not to worship – a fact which seemed to especially displease Pelagius.

Above being merely self-destructive, these students harmed others: When they weren’t shirking their spiritual duties or studying amatory discourses, they were busy trying to entangle themselves in the gears of the university administration by forming illicit students’ societies and fraternities in order to promote their favorite professors on the basis of personal affection and whim. And, of course, they would take their expense money from parents and spend it in taverns and games, only to eventually flee the university (with outstanding fees), bereft of knowledge, conscience, or money.

Those students of the twenty-first century who do not rise above the lowest common denominator are, at least, keeping a centuries-old tradition alive.

Marri Lynn is a Master’s student in the History of Medicine at McGill University, Montreal. You can find out more about her other projects at her About.me page.


Jefferson’s Writing on the Declaration

By John Ferling

The Committee of Five

The Committee of Five - the group that was charged with drafting the Declaration

Thomas Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration of Independence was improved by Congress’ attention.

Congress made the Declaration of Independence a leaner document, one that was more forceful and, in its brevity, more likely to be read. Altogether, Congress pruned the draft by nearly a third. Even with the additions made by Congress, the Declaration of Independence runs just over 1,400 words, not much longer than an op-ed piece in a modern daily newspaper.

Only one congressman was anguished by what Congress did to Jefferson’s draft, and that was Jefferson himself. Like any writer, he suffered silently in acute distress as his colleagues critiqued his composition, adding words, tinkering with a phrase here and there, and expunging entire sentences. Seeing his colleague’s anguish, Franklin tried to comfort Jefferson by explaining – as has many an editor to many a despairing author – that brevity can be more compelling.

About the author: John Ferling is a leading authority on late 18th and early 19th century American history. He is the author of many books, including Independence, The Ascent of George Washington, Almost a Miracle, Setting the World Ablaze, and A Leap in the Dark. He lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

Independence

Giveaway is closed.

Would you like an email notification of other drawings? Sign up for our weekly digest in the sidebar –>.