Category Archives: War

An Epidemic Caused by Alcohol: Beaune, 1746

By Lisa Smith (W&M Regular Contributor)

After the Battle of Rocoux (11 October, 1746), several Dutch prisoners of war were held in Beaune (Burgundy).  Townsmen were recruited as guards, with local lawyers and physicians – men of responsibility – as captains. Physician Vivant-Augustin Ganiare (1698-1781) expressed concerns about the prisoners being a potential source of contagion in November. They had dysentery and seemed to be the source of a local worm outbreak.

Over Christmas, several young captains provided their men with wine and tobacco to help morale, which led first to “bacchanals” and then to the worst-ever hangover: a flu-like epidemic for the whole town. Men, especially those who had been on recent guard duty, were the main victims. Women and children in turn caught it from male family members.

An unnamed ‘Monsieur’ aged 37 was typical. He spent two nights on watch with his friends, where they drank and danced with the prisoners. Off duty, he ran about the streets in “excessive joy”. The alcohol’s effects were worsened by sudden temperature changes between the heat of revelry and the cold outside.

Fraternization was bad enough, but the underlying problem was failed leadership. Ganiare was unsurprised that nearly all of Monsieur Navetier’s men had died since Navetier had been particularly generous. The captains should have known better than to give their men booze. The entire town now suffered from their foolishness!

Ganiare maintained detailed notes of interesting cases and monthly summaries of general health trends, crops and weather. As a man of science, Ganiare wanted to identify patterns in epidemics and weather; as a religious man, he hoped to see the hand of God in nature. By uncovering nature’s secrets, he hoped to control disease outbreaks.

This time Ganiare had no need to search further for nature’s secrets. His conclusion? The epidemic, caused by fraternization and carousing, had been entirely preventable.

A cautionary tale for the festive season…

Lisa Smith is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Saskatchewan. She writes on gender, family, and health care in England and France (ca. 1600-1800).

Image:  Hospital (Hôtel-Dieu), Beaune: courtyard. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

 

Cowboys and Indians: North African Style

By Pamela Toler, W & M Contributor

Unlikely though it seems, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the French Foreign Legion over the last week.

I bet most of you have a few stock images of the Foreign Legion in your heads: men fleeing from their past into the desert and anonymity, absinthe, burning sands and blazing sun, those funny little billed caps with the flap down the back. (Extra points for anyone who knows what those caps are called.)

For most of us, those images come from trashy novels and B-movies that are kissing cousins to the American western at its least thoughtful. Both genres are heavy on the last minute arrival of the cavalry*, noble (or savage) armed horsemen as opponents, last chance saloons, and strong, silent heroes. Not to mention burning sands and blazing sun (see above).

And just like in the American western, the dangerous armed horseman on the ridge has his own version of the story.

Abd al-Qadir by Rudolf Ernst

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the French hadn’t invaded Algeria in 1830**, Algerian emir Abd al-Qadir would probably have been content to follow his grandfather and father as the spiritual leader of the Qadiriyah Sufi order. In the fall of 1832, when the French began to expand their control into the Algerian interior, the Arab tribes of Oran elected al-Qadir as both the head of the Qadiriyah order and as their military leader.

Al-Qadir led Arab resistance against French expansion in North Africa from 1832 to 1847. He was so successful that at one point two-thirds of Algeria recognized him as its ruler. The French signed treaties with al-Qadir and broke them. (Similarities to the American western, anyone?) After a crushing defeat in 1843, he was hunted across North Africa as an outlaw.

Abd al-Qadir surrendered at the end of 1847 and was imprisoned in France until 1853. Following his release, he settled in Damascus, where he entered the stage of world history one last time. In 1860, the Muslims of Damascus rose and began slaughtering the city’s Christians. When the Turkish authorities did nothing to stop the massacre, Abd al-Qadir and 300 followers rescued over 12,0000 Christians from the massacre. Once hunted by the French as a dangerous outlaw, Abd al-Qadir received the Legion of Honor from Napoleon III for his efforts.

Heroism is in the eye of the beholder.

*In fact, the Foreign Legion was an infantry unit. Just saying.

** Over what the French press called the Incident of the Flyswatter. I couldn’t make this stuff up.

This post previously appeared in History on the Margins.

About the author: Pamela Toler is a freelance writer with a PhD in history and a large bump of curiosity. She is particularly interested in the times and places where two cultures meet and change. 

Al-Kahina: The Berber Boudica

By Eamonn Gearon

Far from being natives of North Africa, Arab armies only entered Egypt in 639. Just 71 years later they crossed the Strait of Gibraltar to begin their invasion of Europe. These remarkable conquests were greater and swifter than any achieved by Greece or Rome. Even so, it was not a story of unbroken victories.

Some uprisings persisted for decades, prompting one Arab governor to declare, “The conquest of Ifriqiya is impossible; scarcely has one Berber tribe been exterminated than another takes its place.” The Roman term of opprobrium for any non-Roman – barbarian – became a proper name, creating a Berber identity uniting a people. Unfortunately for the Berbers, this common identity did not equal united resistance.

The most serious Berber resistance was the campaign led by the Berber tribal elder al-Kahina, or “the prophetess.” Variously claimed as a Jewess and a Christian by co-religionists, and described as a witch or a sorceress by her detractors, al-Kahina’s bravery and desire to remain free of foreign domination inspired others to mount numerous, ultimately doomed, revolts.

Described as a beauty with the gift of prophecy, she put this last skill to good use, sending her sons to her Arab enemies. The Arabs, recognising the skills inherent in the boys’ mother, raised them to become successful commanders of Arab armies. In this way, the Berbers were able to claim some glory from a story that is otherwise characterised by defeat and subjugation.

Al-Kahina herself died fighting the Arabs in around 702. Since then, al-Kahina has inspired Berber nationalists, Maghrebi feminists and, in the 19th and 20th centuries, French colonialists! Even today, while virtually unknown in the West, al-Kahina’s name is legendary across North Africa, but perhaps she foresaw that too.

Eamonn Gearon is an analyst and historian who has lived and worked across the Greater Middle East for nearly two decades. He is the author of The Sahara: A Cultural History. More information about the book and an author interview can be found at www.eamonngearon.com

About the image: “The Berber Woman” was painted in 1870 by the French Orientalist artist Émile Vernet-Lecomte (1821-1900).

 

 

Crossing the Bridge With John Brown

Ruined railroad bridge at Harper's Ferry, W.Va., 1862.

Ruined railroad bridge at Harper's Ferry, W.Va., 1862.

By Brook Wilensky-Lanford (Wonders & Marvels Contributor)

Recently, I  reviewed Tony Horwitz’s new book, Midnight Rising: John Brown and the Raid that Sparked the Civil War, for the San Francisco Chronicle. As history readers, you probably know Horwitz’s previous work Confederates in the Attic, telling the Civil War story through its modern-day re-enactors, or  A Voyage Long And Strange, following in the footsteps of pre-Mayflower explorers.

In these books, Horwitz writes in the first person, dramatizing historical events through his own physical presence.  Someone once said the job of the writer is to build two bridges: between yourself and the subject, and between the subject and the reader. For Horwitz, the two bridges were the same.  He let you in on his own experience discovering the subject.

But Midnight Rising, an account of the life, defeat, and eventual martyrdom of the revolutionary abolitionist John Brown, is entirely in the third person.  In the prologue, he explained: “I could tread where Brown’s men did, glimpse some of what they saw, but the place I wanted to be was inside their heads.”  It’s always impressive when a seasoned writer tries out new things, and it got me thinking about my own process.

My own book, Paradise Lust: Searching for the Garden of Eden, covers almost 200 years of history. Several people advised me to write it in the first person. But it just didn’t seem right–I wasn’t there in 1881, when the first president of Boston University said that the Garden of Eden had been at the North Pole! Like Horwitz, I was less interested in commenting on my characters than in trying to get inside their heads.

I ended up compromising: the first three sections are in third-person, and the final section, in the present, is in the first person.  But Midnight Rising makes me wonder about this.  In his acknowledgements (which I always read first!) Horwitz mentions crossing the bridge at Harper’s Ferry by night, as Brown’s men did.  So he did go and do all the on-the-ground research, he just didn’t include it as part of the narrative.

Would you ever put yourself in a story about the past? If so, when?  And how does your on-the-ground research inform your in-the-past storytelling?

 

Brook Wilensky-Lanford is the author of Paradise Lust: Searching for the Garden of Eden, which was a New York Times Editors’ Choice in August. Her reviews and essays have appeared in Salon, Lapham’s Quarterly, The San Francisco Chronicle and The Boston Globe. A graduate of Columbia University’s nonfiction writing MFA program, she lives in New Jersey.

 

COSMIC NUMBERS: The Numbers That Define Our Universe

By James D. Stein, author of COSMIC NUMBERS: The Numbers That Define Our Universe

COSMIC NUMBERS: The Numbers That Define Our UniverseEver since the development of the slingshot – and possibly even before that – war has acted as a spur for technology. Sometimes this actually works out reasonably well – the jet plane was developed during World War II and became a staple of military aviation during the Korean War. From there it wasn’t long until commercial aviation took advantage of the gain in speed afforded by the jet engine.

Pure science, however, generally sits on the sidelines during a war – which makes the story of Karl Schwarzschild even more surprising. Schwarzschild was a distinguished professor at the University of Gottingen, specializing in what we now call astrophysics. When World War I broke out, Schwarzschild volunteered for service, and was eventually sent to the Russian front.

Schwarzschild managed to obtain a copy of Einstein’s just-published Theory of General Relativity (not the typical reading material of the average soldier), and not only managed to digest it, but became the first person to obtain a solution to the equations that are the heart of the Theory. Sadly, Schwarzschild died of an autoimmune disease shortly thereafter.

The Schwarzschild radius measures the size of a black hole of a given mass. If all the mass of the Earth were concentrated sufficiently to form a black hole, its radius would be about a centimeter. Although there are as yet no technological developments which utilize a black hole, physicists have speculated that black holes may possible be used either as time machines or as ways to provide short cuts from one part of the Universe to another.

About the author: James D. Stein is a past member of the Institute of Advanced Studies and is currently a professor of Mathematics at California State University (Long Beach). His list of publications includes: How to Shoot from the Hip Without Getting Shot in the Foot (with Herbert L. Stone and Charles V. Harlow); How Math Explains the World (a Scientific American Book Club selection); The Right Decision (also a Scientific American Book Club selection); and How Math Can Save Your Life. He has been a guest blogger for Psychology Today and his work has been featured in the Los Angeles Times. He lives in Redondo Beach, California.

Ottoman Bank Bombing in 1903

By David Abulafia

Dubrovnik, credit David Abulafia

Salonika, now known as Thessaloniki, was one of the great Mediterranean cities in which Jews (forming the majority, and still speaking the Spanish of their ancestors expelled from Spain in 1492), Christians and Muslims lived side by side, but increasing nationalism eventually created powerful tensions between the different communities.

In the 1890s radical Macedonian Slavs, who spoke a form of Bulgarian, organised themselves around the ‘Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation’ (IMRO), seeking autonomy for the wide swathe of Ottoman provinces between Salonika and Skopje; but they saw Salonika as the obvious capital, and they were intent on giving these lands a Bulgarian cultural identity. This was intolerable to the Greeks of Salonika, who obliged the Turks with information they picked up about the activities of IMRO.

Before long IMRO decided that the time had come for drastic action. In January 1903 IMRO agents acquired a small grocery shop opposite the Ottoman Bank, staffed by a dour Bulgarian who seemed unwilling to sell the exiguous stock he displayed. At night, though, the shop came to life, as an IMRO team burrowed under the road, placing mines under the handsome edifice of the Ottoman Bank. The tunnellers were almost caught, because they had blocked off one of the city sewers that lay across their path, and the Hotel Colombo, nearby, complained that its plumbing had ceased to work. On 28 April they set off their bombs, demolishing the bank and several neighbouring buildings.

About the author: David Abulafia is Professor of Mediterranean History at Cambridge University and the author of The Mediterranean in History.

The Great Sea

Giveaway is closed.

Would you like an email notification of other drawings? Sign up for our weekly digest in the sidebar.

Fireworks Over the Civil War

By Catherine Clinton

Harper's woodcut, entitled...CHARLESTONIANS WATCHED THE CONFEDERATE BOMBARDMENT OF FT. SUMTER FROM ROOFTOPS OVERLOOKING THE BAY. (LC) Available at National Park Service

Historians have argued long and hard about the causes of the Civil War. The battle over the war’s origins began even before Confederate surrender at Appomattox in April 1865, as Americans continue to explore and re-fight this fascinating chapter of our nation’s history. A June 2011 poll published in Vanity Fair, conducted 150 years after the firing on Ft. Sumter and President Lincoln’s call to arms, indicates that the majority of Americans today believe the origins of the war were rooted in states’ rights – white Southerners’ belief that their institutions and systems (which included slavery) should brook no interference from the federal government. How and why white Southerners decided to bombard federal forts, raise an army and secede from the Unites States continues a source of fascination, even for those with no sympathy for the Confederate project.

In the 1850s novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne would write to his publisher complaining about the “damned mob of scribbling women” who sold more books than his serious literary fraternity. By the 1860s fiction writers would be overtaken by the drama of men and women, caught up in the rising tide of clashing patriotisms, recording their own experiences, with the nation poised to be rent asunder. Memoirists left descendants poignant descriptions of war’s unforgettable images – chronicling hundreds of military encounters – from major battles to minor skirmishes, as the death toll of 700,000 soldiers rose season by season, year by year until war’s bloody conclusion. Women on the homefront have provided generations of novelists with fertile ground, from Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women to Charles Frazier’s Cold Mountain. None has been a more renewable resource than Mary Boykin Chesnut, the wife of a powerful advisor within the Confederate inner circle. An eyewitness to the Richmond palace politics during wartime, a “sechesh” champion challenged by eventual defeat, Chesnut’s diary provided an eager audience with food for thought. Her writing illuminates the inner workings of Confederate consciousness, most particularly her whitewashed and self-serving analysis of race relations. From her opening pages witnessing the shelling of Ft. Sumter from the rooftops of Charleston, through battle scars and body counts, to the last, lingering effects of defeat, Mary Chesnut’s diary offers readers a ringside seat, re-imagining the fireworks of the American Civil War.

About the author: Catherine Clinton holds a chair in U.S. history at Queen’s University Belfast in Northern Ireland. She is the author and editor of over twenty books, most recently Mary Chesnut’s Diary, issued as a Penguin Classic in 2011.

Mary Chesnut's Diary

Giveaway is closed.

Would you like an email notification of other drawings? Sign up for our weekly digest in the sidebar –>.

Lincoln’s Letter of Condolence

By Louis P. Masur

Lincoln's Letter of CondolenceNewspapers recently rang the alarm that the date on a pardon issued by Lincoln was altered in the archives to the date of his assassination in order to make it seem as if one of the President’s final decisions was an act of mercy. This has triggered renewed interest in the question of Lincoln as a commander in chief who was willing to forgive rather than condemn.

But there is a far better window into Lincoln’s heart than one-sentence pardons, and that is the letter of condolence he wrote on December 23, 1862. At the time, Lincoln was suffering. The journalist Noah Brooks saw him at church in November and described the President: “his hair is grizzled, his gait more stooping, his countenance sallow, and there is a sunken, deathly look about the large, cavernous eyes, which is saddening to those who see there the marks of care and anxiety such as no President of the United States has ever before known.”

And yet, notwithstanding the misery and gloom he felt so deeply, Lincoln managed to write one of the most hopeful condolence letters ever composed, a letter that in many ways reveals more about his temperament than almost anything else. Lieutenant Colonel William McCullough of the 4th Illinois Cavalry had been killed in battle, and Lincoln wrote McCullough’s surviving daughter Fanny: “In this sad world of ours, sorrow comes to all; and, to the young, it comes with bitterest agony, because it takes them unawares. The older have learned to ever expect it. I am anxious to afford some alleviation of your present distress. Perfect relief is not possible, except with time. You can not now realize that you will ever feel better. Is not this so? And yet it is a mistake. You are sure to be happy again. To know this, which is certainly true, will make you some less miserable now.”

About the author: Louis P. Masur chairs the American Studies program at Trinity College (CT) and is the author of The Civil War: A Concise History (2011).

The Civil War: A Concise History

Image Credit: Timothy H. O’Sullivan, A Harvest of Death (Gettysburg, 1863). Courtesy of Library of Congress.

A Signature Move: John Hancock and the Fight for Freedom

By Harlow Giles Unger

John HancockJohn Hancock never set out to found a new nation. He was quite happy with the old one, which had made him the wealthiest, most powerful merchant in North America and certain to become the first Lord Hancock. So John Hancock was the least likely man in Boston to start a revolution – until Britain’s Parliament arrogantly miscalculated by trying to refill its treasury by dipping its collective hands into John Hancock’s pockets – and those of other colonial merchants, bankers, and planters.

All were loyal British subjects who would gladly have contributed to Britain’s financial recovery had they been asked. But Britain’s Parliament tried taxing Americans without their consent, and John Hancock went to war, investing almost his entire fortune in arms and ammunition for an army of 13,000 Massachusetts rebels. Almost all farmers untrained in war, Hancock’s “Minutemen” laid siege to Boston and forced the vaunted British Army – the world’s largest, best equipped – to evacuate Boston and sail to Canada, leaving Massachusetts the first American colony to become an independent state. Named president, Hancock joined like-minded foes of British taxation in Philadelphia, where they issued a Declaration of Independence proclaiming all thirteen British colonies independent. Hancock signed their Declaration first, with a large, bold signature that made his name – his “John Hancock” – synonymous with the word “signature.”

After Hancock signed the Declaration, the states united into a Confederation of American States and elected him president of the Confederation Congress – in effect making him first president of the United States – thirteen years before George Washington was elected president.

About the author: Harlow Giles Unger is the author of American Tempest: How the Boston Tea Party Sparked a Revolution, Lion of Liberty: Patrick Henry and the Call to a New Nation, and The Last Founding Father: James Monroe and a Nation’s Call to Greatness. The 2008 Distinguished Visiting Fellow in American History at George Washington’s Mount Vernon, he lives in New York City.

American Tempest: How the Boston Tea Party Sparked a Revolution

The Red Book of Kildare

By Karen Harper

Elizabeth FitzgeraldThe Red Book of Kildare is an actual historical relic used to propel the plot of my novel, The Irish Princess. This rousing story is built around Gera Fitzgerald, “the uncrowned princess of Ireland,” who is hellbent on revenge against the Tudors for her family’s persecution.

During their 1535 revolt against King Henry VIII, the Fitzgeralds hid the book from their English enemies because it contained maps of their domain, lists of important people, title deeds and their wealth. Also, it was a rental book with the names of Fitzgerald loyalists, another reason the Tudors desperately wanted possession of the book. It disappeared about the time of the English siege of Maynooth Castle, the Fitzgerald stronghold, so, since my heroine escapes that, I have her take the book with her and hide it over the years in England until a Fitzgerald earl returns to Ireland.

The king’s forces, of course, would have used the book’s information to ruin, both financially and militarily, those loyal to the Irish Fitzgeralds. The book was originally compiled for my heroine’s father, the Earl of Kildare, “the uncrowned king of Ireland,” by the scholar Philip Flatsbury, circa 1503.

Today The Red Book of Kildare is housed in the British Museum, so the English eventually got their hands on it – but too late for the Tudors. (This book is not to be confused with the legendary lost Book of Kildare from the 1100s in Ireland, which was supposedly dictated by an angel – but that’s another story.)

About the author: A New York Times and USA Today bestselling author, Karen Harper is a former college English instructor (The Ohio State University) and high school literature and writing teacher. A lifelong Ohioan, Karen and her husband Don divide their time between the midwest and the southeast, both locations she has used in her books. Karen’s books have been published in many foreign languages and she won the Mary Higgins Clark Award for 2005. Karen has given numerous talks to readers and writers across the county.

The Irish Princess

Giveaway is closed.

Would you like an email notification of other drawings? Sign up for our giveaway email list by clicking here.