Friend and foe alike agreed that Stephen A. Douglas’ most striking feature was his enormous head. Republican Charles Francis Adams, Jr., thought the five-feet-three inches tall Little Giant a “squab, vulgar little man,” but he was fascinated by the senator’s “immense, frowsy head.” Journalist Murat Halstead sneered that the stocky Douglas required “a large vest,” and that “his waist [was] becoming still more extensive.” But Halstead too was drawn to the cranium. He “has an immense head – in height, and breadth and depth,” he marveled, “you cannot find its equal in Washington.” In a time when phrenologists believed that personality traits were determined by cranial size and shape, what lay behind the senator’s “splendidly developed” forehead was a subject of speculation. But few observers outdid H.M. Flint, a supporter and early biographer. “His massive head rivets undivided attention,” Flint gushed. “It is a head of the antique, with something of the infinite in its expression of power: a head difficult to describe, but better worth description than any other in the country.”
Giveaway is closed.