Historical Fiction from New Points of View

Historical Fiction from New Points of View

By Melissa Luttmann

I recently received a book entitled Annexed, by Sharon Dogar, for review. There are a lot of things I liked about this novel, but at the top of the list is the point of view it’s told from. Annexed is basically a retelling of Anne Frank’s The Diary of a Young Girl, but from the perspective of Peter van Pels, a fellow occupant of the annex. And even though this is definitely Peter’s story, Dogar somehow manages to tell it while remaining true to the spirit of Anne’s diary.

I think this point of view works so well precisely because it’s a different take on events we’re used to viewing through someone else’s perspective. Most people who pick up Dogar’s novel will also have read Anne’s diary, and a lot of the book’s interest lies in comparing the well-known perspective with the less common one. In fact, that’s one of the things I like most about historical fiction in general – being able to read multiple books that cover similar subjects and time periods, yet feature drastically different points of view, some more familiar than others.

So, the next time you come across an event you’d like to write a novel about, consider telling the story from a point of view that isn’t immediately obvious to you or your readers. After all, the way we perceive history depends, at least in part, on who’s telling the story. And as far as I’m concerned, the more perspectives we can bring to a given time in history, the more complete a picture of it we can paint.

Do you especially enjoy reading novels that cover the same subject from different perspectives? Can you recommend any books that do a particularly good job of telling a story from a rarely considered point of view?

Melissa Luttman is Associate Editor for Young Adult History/Historical Fiction at Wonders & Marvels.

Related Posts:

  • http://www.punctualityrules.com –Deb

    I always love reading books that tell the same story from different points of view. Pride & Prejudice by Mr. Darcy. The American Revolution as seen by the British. Whatever. I’m always intrigued by what motivates people and how they perceive things, and it’s always interesting to hear the same story from someone else’s perspective. Fascinating, even … when it’s done well, at least!

  • http://worldofpoe.blogspot.com/ Undine

    That’s a twist on historical novels that I wish would be done more often. (How many times can you read about the Tudor court from the viewpoint of Anne Boleyn?) The author, however, would have to be careful to use a POV that would still guarantee an interesting story. Two novels I can think of offhand that have tried this technique were Elizabeth Byrd’s “Maid of Honor” (Mary Queen of Scots’ story as told by–surprise surprise!–one of her maids of honor,) and Cothburn O’Neal’s “The Very Young Mrs. Poe” (Edgar Allan P. as seen by the very young…well, you get the idea.)

    The problem with these novels is that the two protagonists were not present for most of the historical events they narrated, so there was a lot of exposition with other characters merely “telling” the narrator what was going on, rather than having the narrator describing the events first-hand. In both cases, it made for pretty lifeless reading.