<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abigail Adams, Junk Bond Dealer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html</link>
	<description>A Community for Curious Minds who love History, its Odd Stories, and Good Reads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audra</title>
		<link>http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html/comment-page-1#comment-5693</link>
		<dc:creator>Audra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/?p=3145#comment-5693</guid>
		<description>Oh, I need to read this book!  My wife and her family live by the Abigail Adams house, and I&#039;m often regaled with stories about her.  Now I can return the favor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I need to read this book!  My wife and her family live by the Abigail Adams house, and I&#8217;m often regaled with stories about her.  Now I can return the favor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html/comment-page-1#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/?p=3145#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thank you to Mr. Holton for writing this book.  I&#039;m not too far into it yet, but I like its even-handedness and its ability to go beyond simply glorifying the Adamses&#039; marriage in itself.  I think too many books supposedly about her still unintentionally fall into the trap of not making her the single protagonist.  I really agree with your opinion of the Abigail character in the HBO series - I loved the series overall but thought a lot the characterization of a lot of the characters was a bit off, with Franklin reduced to spouting off his famous aphorisms, Jefferson being far more forceful than he seemingly was, and Hamilton reduced to a dull caricature who lacked charisma.

I haven&#039;t read the Nagel JQA biography in question, but I&#039;d just like to mention that it&#039;s unfortunate that she apparently comes across as a &quot;shrew&quot; in that book.  I know I&#039;m playing the &quot;gender card&quot; to some extent, but I think some would see her &quot;controlling&quot; behavior in less of a negative light if such behavior was perpetrated by a man - when Abigail was forceful in her advice, she&#039;s shrewish, but when a father of that time was, he was simply being dutiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thank you to Mr. Holton for writing this book.  I&#8217;m not too far into it yet, but I like its even-handedness and its ability to go beyond simply glorifying the Adamses&#8217; marriage in itself.  I think too many books supposedly about her still unintentionally fall into the trap of not making her the single protagonist.  I really agree with your opinion of the Abigail character in the HBO series &#8211; I loved the series overall but thought a lot the characterization of a lot of the characters was a bit off, with Franklin reduced to spouting off his famous aphorisms, Jefferson being far more forceful than he seemingly was, and Hamilton reduced to a dull caricature who lacked charisma.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the Nagel JQA biography in question, but I&#8217;d just like to mention that it&#8217;s unfortunate that she apparently comes across as a &#8220;shrew&#8221; in that book.  I know I&#8217;m playing the &#8220;gender card&#8221; to some extent, but I think some would see her &#8220;controlling&#8221; behavior in less of a negative light if such behavior was perpetrated by a man &#8211; when Abigail was forceful in her advice, she&#8217;s shrewish, but when a father of that time was, he was simply being dutiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody Holton</title>
		<link>http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html/comment-page-1#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/?p=3145#comment-3778</guid>
		<description>Hi, Steve. I think your reading of Nagel and McCullough is exactly right: and that&#039;s what makes Abigail Adams such a fun topic - different authors see her differently. McCullough is certainly right that she was often the family&#039;s Rock of Gibraltar, but I think the depiction of her (esp. in the HBO version of McCullough&#039;s book) is too benign. Actually she was at least as passionate as John. I think Nagel may have pushed his point a tad to far, but he is certainly correct that she could be quite controlling (of her kids, grandkids, husband, and others)--and Nagel deserves credit for being the first to make that controversial point. One thing I think Nagel (who was very generous to my own book in a Boston Globe review) should have emphasized more was that if AA was sometimes passive-aggressive, it was because women of the time were never allowed to be simply aggressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Steve. I think your reading of Nagel and McCullough is exactly right: and that&#8217;s what makes Abigail Adams such a fun topic &#8211; different authors see her differently. McCullough is certainly right that she was often the family&#8217;s Rock of Gibraltar, but I think the depiction of her (esp. in the HBO version of McCullough&#8217;s book) is too benign. Actually she was at least as passionate as John. I think Nagel may have pushed his point a tad to far, but he is certainly correct that she could be quite controlling (of her kids, grandkids, husband, and others)&#8211;and Nagel deserves credit for being the first to make that controversial point. One thing I think Nagel (who was very generous to my own book in a Boston Globe review) should have emphasized more was that if AA was sometimes passive-aggressive, it was because women of the time were never allowed to be simply aggressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ulfelder</title>
		<link>http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2009/12/abigail-adams-junk-bond-dealer.html/comment-page-1#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ulfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wondersandmarvels.com/?p=3145#comment-3776</guid>
		<description>Mr. Holton, I just finished Paul C. Nagel&#039;s John Quincy Adams biography and read David McCullough&#039;s John Adams bio earlier this year. The authors&#039; views on Abigail Adams couldn&#039;t be more different: while McCullough paints her affectionately as the rock who held the family together while her husband was off founding a country, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too strong to say she comes across as shrewish and domineering in Nagel&#039;s book. Do you agree, and if so, how do you reconcile the differing treatments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Holton, I just finished Paul C. Nagel&#8217;s John Quincy Adams biography and read David McCullough&#8217;s John Adams bio earlier this year. The authors&#8217; views on Abigail Adams couldn&#8217;t be more different: while McCullough paints her affectionately as the rock who held the family together while her husband was off founding a country, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too strong to say she comes across as shrewish and domineering in Nagel&#8217;s book. Do you agree, and if so, how do you reconcile the differing treatments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

