By David S. Barnes

In the late summer of 1880, a wave of offensive odors descended upon the city of Paris. For just over two months, between late July and early October of that year, Parisians complained of the putrid, insufferable stench. The tone of many reactions was apocalyptic: “[T]he odors are truly unbearable”; “We’ve never seen anything like this!” “This can’t go on!”

Complaints came from all sides. … The press protested violently against the government’s negligence. … People approached one another with but one greeting: “Do you smell that? What a stench!” It was a real public calamity. Parisians were panic-stricken; public officials were anguished; cabinet ministers were troubled.

Medical authorities, journalists, and fearful residents all agreed that the odors brought with them the threat of deadly diseases. The chorus of popular protest was seconded by scientific authority, as a special commission composed of the nation’s leading medical scientists (including Louis Pasteur, the father of bacteriology) concluded that foul-smelling emanations were capable of transmitting the germs of contagious disease, and that “these odors which have spread over Paris … can pose a threat to the public health.”

Fifteen years later, the capital’s residents again found themselves beset by stench. “Fetid emanations,” “nauseating” and “disgusting” odors, “Paris again turning putrid”—the noisy complaints that began in early June 1895 sound like a reprise of August and September 1880.

Disgusted and indignant reactions to the odors of Paris again emphasized their intolerability and the urgent imperative of remedial action. As in 1880, the search for the culprits focused on the sewers and on suburban waste treatment plants, and once again local government officials were harshly criticized for inaction and complacency. Only the certainty of impending epidemics and the search for germs in the foul miasmas were missing from the public reaction in 1895.

David Barnes, author of The Great Stink of Paris and the Nineteenth-Century Struggle against Filth and Germs, is a historian of medicine and public health who has taught at the University of Pennsylvania since 2002. He received his Ph.D. in History from the University of California, Berkeley.

IMAGE: City street-cleaning tanks dispense perfume instead of water. Caption: “A means of combating the odors of Paris.”

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Vicky Alvear Shecter November 27, 2009 at 10:23 am

This post reminds me of something a high school teacher once said (yes, I can remember that far back). He told us that if we could magically transport to the past, we would faint within minutes from the smells of unwashed bodies, untreated sewage and god knows what else. I often wonder if the reverse is true–would the Parisians from the 1880s faint at our smells? Our perfumed soaps and detergents, pollution, gas emissions, plastics, etc. would likely overwhelm and gag them too. It’s not often we get to consider the smells of different periods. This book sounds fascinating.

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: