
By Lisa Rosner
Why, when a beautiful girl is murdered, are people so quick to assume that it must somehow have been her own fault?
That has been the unfortunate fate of Mary Paterson, killed by Burke and Hare in April 1828, her body sold to anatomy lecturer Dr. Robert Knox. As if it were not bad enough to be burked at the age of 18, preserved in alcohol for three months and then dissected, she has also been saddled with a reputation as a notorious prostitute.
First claimed as “a person of disorderly life…cut short in her sinful career,” by an oft-quoted, though unreliable contemporary source, she was recently, and as unreliably, characterized in the Scotsman as “a voluptuous beauty whose body was for sale…” who “would hitch up her skirt in the shadows of Edinburgh’s Canongate.” Artists’ renditions of at least two different naked women circulated, each purporting to be the “true” Mary Paterson stretched out on the dissecting slab; and the rumor spread by word of mouth, and later through fiction and film, that she was recognized by her medical student lover as he stood, scalpel in hand, ready for the morning’s work.
But the very fact that Mary Paterson’s cadaver was beautiful makes it highly unlikely that she was the kind of homeless streetwalker implied by the Scotsman, and one of her friends spoke out against the contemporary rumors; “she may have been ‘irregular’ in her habits,” but “not so low as she has been represented.” The excellent Edinburgh archives confirm this, as they document the admission of Mary Paterson into the Magdalene Asylum, a kind of reform school for penitent prostitutes, at the age of 16.
This was a sign of “irregular” habits indeed, but not of notorious prostitution, because the archives also document that she left the Asylum less than week before her murder. She had no time in her brief life to embark on a “sinful career,” or to form a liaison with Burke or medical students. She was not “asking” for death: it came to her simply because, one April morning, she encountered a murderer on the Canongate.
Lisa Rosner is Professor of History at Stockton College, Pomona, NJ, where she is also Interim Director of the South Jersey Center for Digital Humanities. Anatomy Murders
, the third book in her Edinburgh Trilogy, has allowed her to delve ever-deeper into the seamy side of early modern medicine. For more on Burke and Hare, including animated walking tours through 1820s Edinburgh and a re-creation of an anatomical dissection, visit http://burkeandhare.com.
IMAGE: Canongate Edinburgh Looking West, Thomas Hosmer Shepherd (c.1810 to c.1842)
Tagged as:
anatomy murders,
burke and hare,
canongate,
edinburgh,
lisa rosner,
mary paterson,
scotland
{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
I have just ordered a copy of Lisa Rosner’s new book about Burke and Hare, and will be interested to read it. By coincidence, I have just published an ebook on a related subject, which others may find interesting. It is about Sir Anthony Carlisle, the early 19c surgeon, titled “The Real Mr Frankenstein”. In my research I looked for evidence of “burking ” prior to Burke and Hare. To my initial surprise, I found a number of 18C examples. The most noteworthy and shocking instances, arose from research which now demonstrates, beyond reasonable doubt, that the famous 18C anatomical atlases of William Smellie and William Hunter, depict undelivered subjects who were murdered to order, i.e. burked, the only way for them to procure such extremely rare subjects for dissection. From that and other research, I now believe burking was quite widespread, especially in London, during the 18C. Regards, Don
Hi Don. Let us know what you think about the book. And good luck with yours! Holly